- Joined
- Jan 14, 2006
- Messages
- 342
- Reaction score
- 4
Hey,
I was playing around with some numbers using SABOTLOADERS data from one of his posts. (Thanks Sabotloader :!: ) Scroll past his table.
There are variables everywhere, no doubt, but lets TRY to compare apples to apples. Lets say we have some work to be done. Lets propel the Hornady .40 200 gr. XTP to approx. 1900 fps. This can be done with 60 gr. (WEIGHED) charge of T7 2F. ( avg. 1903 fps) I used a .75 factor to his 80 gr. volumn . I think .75 should be close. Also note that the T7 3F averaged 1943 fps .
Also following Sabotloaders data.. with BH 209... it took 90 gr. volumn.. also 60 gr, weighed (using the .667 factor) to achieve an avg . velocity of 1898fps. So how much did it cost to do this work? Using pricing at grafs, I can get a 10 0z. bottle of BH 209 for $26.39. I can get a 16 oz. bottle of T7 either 2F or 3F for $17.99. You can shoot that load 73 times from the BH bottle and 116+ times from the T7 bottle. $ .361 per shot for the BH or $.154 for the T7.
Some of us might say (including myself) "I dont mind paying a LITTLE extra to get some added benefits." How much extra? If you were willing to pay 50% MORE than the T7, then the 10 oz. bottle of BH209 should cost you $16.86. Lets say you would even pay 75% MORE than the T7 costs to shoot that same projectile. That 10 oz. bottle of BH should then cost you $19.67. How about 135% MORE??...OUCH!!
I was reading Bob Shells review of BH 209 at biggamehunt.net. He was noting the high price of BH. "I was told it was due to the holes" (in the powder grains). Western told him it was difficult to manufacture and that raises production costs. Look at BH and then IMR 4759 under magnifying glass. Not easy to tell them apart. Very similar looking holes. Somehow, it can be done it with the IMR4759 for $17.59/pound. (Graf)
Hey western, heres an idea for the short term. Give us a POUND of the BH209 for the $26.39. That would then ONLY be 50% more than the T7 in the example given above. Tell us you figured out an easier way to do the hole..
I am not slamming BH 209- the product, just BH- the price. I submit there is nothing in that little bottle to command that pricing. Heck, nitro been around since the 1840's.
:lol: Just trying to shame western. :wink:
I was playing around with some numbers using SABOTLOADERS data from one of his posts. (Thanks Sabotloader :!: ) Scroll past his table.
There are variables everywhere, no doubt, but lets TRY to compare apples to apples. Lets say we have some work to be done. Lets propel the Hornady .40 200 gr. XTP to approx. 1900 fps. This can be done with 60 gr. (WEIGHED) charge of T7 2F. ( avg. 1903 fps) I used a .75 factor to his 80 gr. volumn . I think .75 should be close. Also note that the T7 3F averaged 1943 fps .
Also following Sabotloaders data.. with BH 209... it took 90 gr. volumn.. also 60 gr, weighed (using the .667 factor) to achieve an avg . velocity of 1898fps. So how much did it cost to do this work? Using pricing at grafs, I can get a 10 0z. bottle of BH 209 for $26.39. I can get a 16 oz. bottle of T7 either 2F or 3F for $17.99. You can shoot that load 73 times from the BH bottle and 116+ times from the T7 bottle. $ .361 per shot for the BH or $.154 for the T7.
Some of us might say (including myself) "I dont mind paying a LITTLE extra to get some added benefits." How much extra? If you were willing to pay 50% MORE than the T7, then the 10 oz. bottle of BH209 should cost you $16.86. Lets say you would even pay 75% MORE than the T7 costs to shoot that same projectile. That 10 oz. bottle of BH should then cost you $19.67. How about 135% MORE??...OUCH!!
I was reading Bob Shells review of BH 209 at biggamehunt.net. He was noting the high price of BH. "I was told it was due to the holes" (in the powder grains). Western told him it was difficult to manufacture and that raises production costs. Look at BH and then IMR 4759 under magnifying glass. Not easy to tell them apart. Very similar looking holes. Somehow, it can be done it with the IMR4759 for $17.59/pound. (Graf)
Hey western, heres an idea for the short term. Give us a POUND of the BH209 for the $26.39. That would then ONLY be 50% more than the T7 in the example given above. Tell us you figured out an easier way to do the hole..
I am not slamming BH 209- the product, just BH- the price. I submit there is nothing in that little bottle to command that pricing. Heck, nitro been around since the 1840's.
:lol: Just trying to shame western. :wink: