I'm looking forward to next year and thinking about jumping on the ML bandwagon. Trying to decide if I should get a remmy 700 ml ($150-250ish)/ remmy genesis (Less than $200)/ TC triumph ($350-ish) which are relatively cheap now and use BH 209 or just get a 10 ml. Smokeless is legal in my state.
I know the general pros and cons of smokeless versus non-smokeless, but was wondering about something I thought you guys would know.
Assuming one wanted to shoot a hornady 250g sst at 200 fps. I believe it would take around 100g of BH 209. How much VV110 would it take? 38 grains?
Point I'm trying to make to myself is that I would assume the recoil would be substantially different between these two loads, assuming equal weight guns with the VV being much lower. Right?
The savage would be substantially more expensive to buy new but the cost per shot would be substantially less.
What to do... what to do...
Thanks for any input
I know the general pros and cons of smokeless versus non-smokeless, but was wondering about something I thought you guys would know.
Assuming one wanted to shoot a hornady 250g sst at 200 fps. I believe it would take around 100g of BH 209. How much VV110 would it take? 38 grains?
Point I'm trying to make to myself is that I would assume the recoil would be substantially different between these two loads, assuming equal weight guns with the VV being much lower. Right?
The savage would be substantially more expensive to buy new but the cost per shot would be substantially less.
What to do... what to do...
Thanks for any input