Warne or Leupold Rings ?

[Dedduc]

Anyone of these better then the other?

 

[toytruck]

Warne for me, never had a issue. No experience with Leupold.

 

[ENCORE50A]

Leupold Mark4 rings. They are the strongest Leupold has.

For reference............ I used them on a BP Xpress shooting 180grs of T7 and 300gr bullets. They did not fail.
Don't buy Leupold standard mounts and rings.

 

[snapbang]

I have Warne on 5-6 muzzys. No issues period.

 

[michiganmuzzy]

Ive got both brands and like them both. Depends on the model. I think i would lean a little more toward favoring the Warnes

 

[ElDiablo]

Nothing wrong in general with either for the average guy. (It is much easier to keep a scope level when mounting though with horizontal split rings instead of vertical.)

 

[Black Locust]

Burris Zee Rings for the win.

 

[LBAhunter]

Warne rings on everything I got.

 

[anonymouscowherd]

Burris Zee Rings for the win.

Is it the Zee or the Signatures that have the inserts to let you shift POI when scope is mechanically centered?

Anyway, whichever of those two it is... those.

 

[Black Locust]

Signature has the inserts. I've used them on a Mauser scope set-up where things were a bit wonky.

The ZEE ring is a rock-solid sum b***h.

It's all I use on many, many, rifles and they've never failed to perform.

 

[jsteurrys]

I like the Burris Signature Zee Rings also. I use them on all my SMLs. The inserts are a great feature for keeping your scopes optically centered.

 

[Keone]

I run Warne or Vortex pro series rings.

 

[LBAhunter]

Signature has the inserts. I've used them on a Mauser scope set-up where things were a bit wonky.

The ZEE ring is a rock-solid sum b***h.

It's all I use on many, many, rifles and they've never failed to perform.

Burris rings came highly recommended when I first got my single shot pistol. The ones I had must have slipped through Quality inspection. Scope would move and didn't fit the base quite right. So, I switched from Burris rings to Warne rings. The reason for my first post.